Login to LibApps


Citation Research and Impact Metrics: Journals

Index

Introduction to:
Article Assessments
Author Assessments
Country Assessments
Journal Rankings

Metrics:
Altmetric Score

Citation Benchmarking
Citation Counts for: 
---Articles
---Authors
---Countries
Citation Distribution, see Citation Benchmarking
CiteScore 
Collaboration

Eigenfactor Score, see Other Journal Rankings
ERIH Plus, see Other Journal Rankings

Field-weighted citation impact (FWCI), see Citation Benchmarking
FWCI, see Citation Benchmarking

Google Scholar (Journal) Metrics, see Other Journal Rankings

Harzing, see Other Journal Rankings
Hirsch-index
h-index

iCite for:
---Articles, see Citation Benchmarking
---Authors

JIF
Journal Impact Factor

NIH ranking, see iCite

Publish or Perish software, see Citation Counts for Authors: Other Sources

RCR, see iCite
Relative Citation Ratio, see iCite

Scimago Country Rank (SCR)
Scimago Journal Rank, see CiteScore 
SJR, see CiteScore
SNIP, see CiteScore​
​Source Normalized Impact per Paper, see CiteScore

Usage Counts

Introduction to Journal Assessment

Journal rankings quantify a journal's performance using citation data.  The original journal ranking scheme is the "Journal Impact Factor" (JIF) produced from citation counts collected from the Web of Science database.  Several other schemes developed since then include Eigenfactor, Scimago Journal Ranking (SJR), Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP), and most recently, CiteScore.  Most of these subsequent schemes purport to improve upon the JIF by including field normalization into their calculations, however, all of the schemes have weaknesses.  

In this section, we focus on two of the journal ranking metrics, CiteScore and JIF, however, we also have a brief selection of other Journal Rankings.  

 

Important Points:

  • Ever since the JIF was invented, journal rankings have been misunderstood and frequently misused.  
  • Journal rankings evaluate the performance of a journal as a whole but say nothing about the impactfulness or quality of an individual article within the journal(1).  If one examines the citation distribution curve for journals, it's easy to see that article citation counts within the journal vary but do so along a similar curve regardless of each journal's rank(2).  Publication in a highly ranked journal does not guarantee an article will have impact, nor does publication in a low ranked journal indicate the absence of impact.   Consequently, journal rankings should not be used to assess an author's publication packet nor an article's impact as the rankings measure neither author nor article performance.  

Best Uses:

  • Journal rankings were originally intended to help librarians determine what journals should be in their collections and for editors to compare their journal's performance to others in the same field.  These remain acceptable uses for journal rankings.  
  • Journal rankings also help researchers find appropriate places for submitting their articles, although researchers should also consider such things as the journal's subject content, readership, and open access/open data policies .   

 

References: 

  1. Berg, Jeremy. JIFfy PopScience, 353(6299): 523, 2016.  doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6493
  2. Lariviere, Vincent; Kiermer, Veronique; MacCallum, Catriona J.; McNutt, Marcia; Patterson, Mark; Pulverer, Bernd; Swaminathan, Sowmya; Taylor, Stuart; and Curry, Stephen.  A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions.  bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jul. 5, 2016.  doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/062109

Hours and Locations