The foundation of modern scholarly publishing, mainly the academic journal and the peer review process, commemorated its 350th anniversary in 2015. Scholarly publishing is a vehicle for the global communication of knowledge. Traditional methods of scholarly publishing (i.e. the peer reviewed journal) target a specific and limited audience. However, today's digital age and new methods of scholarly communication provide more opportunities to connect with a broader and more inclusive audience.
The prevalence of inaccurate information online requires a more involved effort from the scientific community to actively advocate for the importance and value of their work to a broader audience, to improve access, and to promote reputable information. As scholars, we need to be proactive and assume ownership of our work to ensure it is communicated accurately.
For these, and many other reasons, scholars are developing new publishing and business models for sharing research.
A prominent online presence helps you share your work through increased visibility, track your impact in the field, and network with others. It also fosters an identifiable personal brand; allowing you to market your achievements. A variety of social networks and other tools help you reach an increasingly varied audience beyond traditional scholarly outlets.
Remember a social networking site is not a digital repository. Sites like academia.edu and Research Gate are powerful tools for sharing your work. However, online platforms do not properly substitute for a digital repository's stable and reliable long-term accessibility. Here are some suggested services, all with different strengths and weaknesses.
Journal impact measurements assess the prestige, importance, or rank of a journal in a particular field. Knowing the impact or importance of the journal can help you decide where to submit an article. Authors may use the Journal Cost Effectiveness search engine to locate internationally published journals and compile a ranking by price per article or citation. The most commonly used metric is the Journal Impact Factor, issued by Journal Citation Reports. However, there are other methods of evaluating the importance of a particular journal. For an extended list of sources, view the Citation Research: Journal Rankings library guide.
When preparing to publish your work, consider these issues related to the publication cycle early in the process. These include: complying with research regulations, locating funding, managing your information, selecting a journal or other publication venue, and understanding your rights as an author when signing a publishing agreement.
For more detailed information, see the "Getting Published" library guide.
Publication Cycle (click on image to expand).
While no number can truly measure the value of your work, citation metrics can provide a starting point for measuring a work's impact. There are several tools and methods available to measure various types of impact. For a detailed analysis of different citation metrics, consult the Citation Research and Impact Metrics library guide.